"Energized" -- the Cardinal wins the Lottery!
By Diogenes (articles ) | December 02, 2006 9:49 AM
At the beginning of the year, the Archdiocese of Los Angeles came up with a plan to split its sex abuse liabilities into two categories. One group of cases would be litigated (i.e., contested in court) with the "hope" that the Archdiocese's insurers would step forward to pay for the losers. The second group would not go to court but would be settled for a cash payment. By what criterion did the Archdiocese decide which case belongs to which category? Well, the crimes that occurred before 1985 went into the first group, those after 1985 into the second. By a truly extraordinary coincidence, 1985 is the year Cardinal Mahony took the job of archbishop, which, as OTR noted at the time, seemed to point to the following archepiscopal twofer:
1) The abuse that occurred on Mahony's watch (post-1985) will be settled, for cash, out of court. That means no trial, hence no senior ecclesiastics in the witness box, hence no consequent arraignment for complicity or perjury, hence no jail time for You Know Who.
2) The abuse that occurred before Mahony's time (pre-1985) will go to trial -- by an arrangement in which nine of the 44 select cases are agreed upon -- and whatever hit the Archdiocese takes will be financial. That means no senior ecclesiastics in the witness box (the relevant ones are dead), hence no consequent arraignment for complicity or perjury, hence no jail time for You Know Who.
It looks as if the first shoe has dropped. Yesterday Cardinal Mahony announced an agreement with the attorney for the plaintiffs in the pay-off category, viz., those that occurred on his watch after 1986, as well as those that occurred prior to 1954 (when it is claimed the Archdiocese was uninsured). The Cardinal's handshake was worth $60 million for 45 victims, or a million three for every celebration of diversity. Below is the LA Times' graphic giving the box score for the major leagues. LA's Buggery Bill Batting Average puts them just behind Milwaukee and just ahead of the Padres:
Keep in mind that LA's potential liability extends to 570 cases. We're still nowhere near the All Star break. You'll be pleased to know that none of the $60 million comes from parish accounts; rather, the better part was found by a careful search beneath the chancery sofa cushions and was -- you've gotta love this -- "set aside":
Mahony said the planned payout would not adversely affect parish functions or ministries. "We set aside last year $40 million for this settlement. While it is painful, no parishes are affected," he said. The remaining $20 million would come from limited insurance payouts, as well as $8 million from five religious orders that had members involved in the cases, said attorney J. Michael Hennigan, who negotiated on behalf of the archdiocese.
Mahony said the settlement was "very important to us."
"Very important to us." Must be tough to keep that grin off his face. "Us," in this connection, means "Me."
So it looks as if the twofer is working as it was designed to. The risky part for Mahony concerned the category just settled. With a one-third cut of $60 million dangling in front of them, the plaintiffs' attorneys will lose interest in the personnel files, as planned, and healing will take place in no time. In fact, healing has already begun! Whereas Cardinal Law seemed crushed by his mega-million payout, Mahony's $60 mil has "energized" him:
Both church officials and attorneys representing those suing said Friday that much of their focus would now turn toward the more than 500 cases from the time period when the church had insurance coverage.
"The task will be for the insurance companies to step forward," Mahony said Friday. "I feel much more energized for the other 500 cases now. We anticipate there will be further pain down the road for us."
"Further pain down the road for us." Must be tough to keep that grin off his face. "Us," in this connection, means "You."
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our final 2013 goal ($22,856 to go, assuming receipt of matching funds):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Deacon Bart -
Dec. 05, 2006 3:44 PM ET USA
Stickler, Holy Mother Church is and always will be "One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". Because we members are sinful does not make Jesus' bride less spotless. Pray for all clergy, including me, that we may mirror what Jesus intended. Think of Ez 3:17 - 21 & Ez 13. For the sake of our souls, pray for those bishops, priests & deacons who are most in need pray the Roasry for Our Lady's intercession.
Posted by: Fr. William -
Dec. 03, 2006 1:56 PM ET USA
Thank you, again, Diogenes, for pointing out the corruption in the Church's hiearchy. We have to pray for holy boldness among the hierarchy, as I am confident that pseudodionysius, wheresthemoneyroger, sticker1898, ignacio, et al know so well. Cdl. Mahony's actions are bold but evil, as he scandalizes the faithful. The only person who can reprimand the Cdl. is the Holy Father. Let us pray for Pope B-XVI to enact Canon 401-2, for Cdl. Mahony is a sick man & he's causing serious damage.
Posted by: -
Dec. 03, 2006 7:16 AM ET USA
Has anyone ever wondered about Christ's admonition: "By their fruits, ye shall know them?" Does anyone truly believe that we are still "One, Holy and Catholic Church," anymore? Would anyone with just a cursory awareness of the goings on in our seminaries, our rectories, on the Altars of God declare so? Do the Cardinal Mahonys truly represent today's Catholic Church? And, can we finally reconcile Daniel's "The Abomination of Desolation" prophecy, being fulfilled in this sad group of bishops?
Posted by: Ignacio177 -
Dec. 03, 2006 6:59 AM ET USA
I wonder what a pious Bishop would say in such circumstances? Would it not be better just to say "no comment" rather than put the foot in the mouth.
Posted by: michaelwilmes -
Dec. 02, 2006 3:45 PM ET USA
When I attended Catholic high school in the early eighties, we had the CYO (Catholic youth organization) center for recreation. Many bishops have a similar center they recreate in. Only they call it a "CYA" center......
Posted by: -
Dec. 02, 2006 3:26 PM ET USA
All this time I have been wondering - wheresthemoneyroger? - I never thought to look under the seat cushions. It does leave unanswered another question....how much more is there set aside under the cushions? And by the way, what happened to the millions Mahony buudy Bishop Pat Ziemann pilfered in Santa Rosa.?
Posted by: Pseudodionysius -
Dec. 02, 2006 2:25 PM ET USA
Um.... 983 victims in Boston but only 45 in Los Angeles? ? Something seems a little fishy.
Posted by: Gino -
Dec. 02, 2006 1:54 PM ET USA
Maybe the Vatican can now find a nice Cathedral in Rome for Cardinal Mahoney to preside over, a la Cardinal Law. Just wishful thinking, but it would be nice!
Posted by: major -
Dec. 02, 2006 12:24 PM ET USA
It is painful to think about all the money the Cardinall spent on his new Cathedral and then to have the where-with-all to fork our over 60 million! Ah-the active participation of the laity!
Posted by: Leo XIII727 -
Dec. 02, 2006 12:13 PM ET USA
There is more than an ocean and 8,000+ miles between Rome and Los Angeles. It is as if the internet and modern communications had yet to be invented, as if Rome were blissfully unaware of the scoundrels in LA.
Posted by: Clorox -
Dec. 02, 2006 10:19 AM ET USA
Sixty million here, one hundred million there. Keep this up and we will be talking about real money.