my, how i've grown!
By Diogenes (articles ) | Nov 04, 2006
The Paulists' Busted Halo interviews Andrew Sullivan on his favorite subject: Andrew Sullivan. I was struck by this comment in editor Bill McGarvey's intro: "Where Sullivan differs most from his colleagues in our ever-expanding punditocracy is in his ability to openly doubt his own judgements and actions."
Up to a point, Lord Copper. Sullivan's soul-searching works in precisely the opposite way McGarvey would have us imagine. Sullivan typically sets himself up as, e.g., a Catholic; whence he pretends to have held the beliefs that Catholics hold; he then trains his very peculiar "self-doubt" on the convictions maintained by his fellow Catholics, and -- surprise! -- he finds these convictions no longer merit his assent. He's grown. He has the modesty to admit it himself.
Check out Sullivan's radical self-doubt in the passage that follows:
An unexamined faith is not worth having it seems to me. That is not something that we should be afraid of. I fear that the hierarchy has become afraid of it because I think they got panicked by the Second Council and what happened afterwards, and the thought that they were losing authority and losing control. And one can understand that. But, at the same time, I think there comes a point where one would have to say, Maybe they need a little more humility in letting go a bit and opening a respectful dialogue within the Church about some of these questions, which are open to legitimate faithful discussions.
Ah yes. Maybe they need a little more humility.
Not to put too fine a point on it, Sullivan's self-appraisal is disingenuous. Too harsh a judgment? Well, if false, it's easily rebutted. Find me an instance where Sullivan has defended, by argument, the Catholic convictions he now pretends to have reconsidered. Surely not too much to ask from such a prolific soul-searcher.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Nov. 06, 2006 1:11 PM ET USA
My grandfather was an Irishman. He had a saying he used in jest: "I thought I was wrong but I was mistaken." It appears that Mr. Sullivan has taken that saying to heart.
Posted by: Tominellay -
Nov. 06, 2006 12:27 PM ET USA
Mr. Sullivan has found a sneaky way to be published again and again and again...You bet it's disingenuous.
Posted by: -
Nov. 06, 2006 9:28 AM ET USA
I don't know why we still give Andrew Sullivan any consideration at all. His self-scrutiny, which is all about his sexual orientation, his ruthless slanders against Pope Benedict, etc., make his thoughts really not worth printing.
Posted by: Fr. William -
Nov. 04, 2006 1:58 PM ET USA
Got me there, Diogenes... sure can't find a single instance where Andy has defended, by any argument whatsoever, the Catholic convictions he now pretends to have reconsidered. Andy is a great guy, though, isn't he... I mean all the heresy and heterodoxy and anti-Church writings that he spews forth really helps people to feel one with the Episcopalians, Lutherans and National Abortion Rights Action League.
Posted by: Pseudodionysius -
Nov. 04, 2006 12:30 PM ET USA
Uncle Di, I'm still nauseous from that post of a few years ago by you where Sullivan was waxing nostalgic about some bizarre belly rub or something. Ick.
Posted by: Leo XIII727 -
Nov. 04, 2006 10:46 AM ET USA
"Dialogue" always seems to boil down to the usual modernist agenda -- womens' ordination, abortion "rights," married clergy, homosexual "rights," all paths lead to heaven, Jesus was just a good man with a message, et cetera, usque ad nauseam. In other words, if it feels good, do it.