Last February, we received 607 gifts, but fell short. This year we need 700. We have 3 to go—donate now!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

tape at eleven

By Diogenes (articles ) | Jun 24, 2006

The Ninth Circuit decides some things are better left unmetered.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our February expenses ($6,729 to go):
$35,000.00 $28,270.54
19% 81%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 4 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Laity1 - Jun. 25, 2006 11:11 PM ET USA

    Not only is the use of such a methodology immoral, I've heard there's a teeny weeny chance for the error of a false negative.

  • Posted by: JW - Jun. 25, 2006 9:02 AM ET USA

    John, if you haven't figured out that Diogenes is angry (some might say bitter) by now... where have you been? But he makes a good point. If you Google St. Lukes Institute plethysmograph, you'll find articles indicating that St. Luke's, an ostensibly Catholic psychiatric treatment center for priests, uses plethysmographs. Which is extremely scandalous.

  • Posted by: - Jun. 25, 2006 12:38 AM ET USA

    An astonishing post for a 'Catholic' forum. Ugly, but astonishing too because so gratuitous and indiscriminate. What is the point? Is it just a joke? In the hope that readers will snicker under their breath tomorrow when they say "And also with you?" Will that help them engage in the liturgy? Taken with the witicism below about blood tests and others like it, is the purpose incrementally to discredit by ridicule all parish priests? Why? Is the writer just angry? It is this forum he discredits.

  • Posted by: JW - Jun. 24, 2006 9:32 PM ET USA

    This is a good ruling, given that exposing anyone to the images necessary for this "test" is gravely immoral. The government should not be in the business of showing pornography to anyone, never mind measuring a man's arousal while he is forced to view any sort of pornography as a condition of releasing him from prison!

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

Two good publishers, six new books for Lent 18 hours ago
Another awkward 'clarification' from the Vatican February 25
Former Israeli ambassador explains how to make 'two-state solution' realistic February 25
Solidarity Campaign: Going well, thanks! And how can you help? February 25
Considering the World of Film February 24

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope Francis to address Congress in joint session in September CWN - February 5