the comforts of home
By Diogenes (articles ) | Mar 21, 2006
In the course of an interview, Barb Nicolosi ponders what meaning comedy, tragedy, and melodrama might have for a child growing-up in a very contemporary social setting.
I was at a real live freak show not long ago with a woman who is a studio writer. Her daughter was playing in a soccer game. This woman was divorced and remarried. So, sitting at the game was the woman and her ex-husband in the center -- because they are the "parents of note," even though they don't live together. Next to the woman is her new husband cradling their new baby. Next to husband number two is his fifteen year old, really bored son from his previous marriage. Meanwhile, on the other side next to the ex-husband, is his new wife with their new baby. And next to her is Debbie, with whom the father lived for three years after the initial divorce, and before he married the new one. In the three years of co-habitation, Debbie bonded with the little girl out there kicking the ball around, because she was there from 8-11, so Debbie was another pseudo mother figure. But wait, Debbie's new boyfriend is also there. And then also in the line is the nanny, who has been the only real constant in the little girl's life.
I'm sitting there, and all these people are all healthy and chatting and meanwhile, they are all kind of fervently there for the little girl so they can show that they are really invested in her, and they have so screwed up her life. She is a mess. I'm saying to myself, "What is comedy for this kid?" Her life is a circus. It's an absolute freak show that can only have one predictable result as a child-raising strategy -- nightmare! But anyway, in terms of the child's ability to appreciate comedy, exactly what is going to make her laugh? Real perverted, twisted stuff. And that is in fact the case.
Good point. The circus is only amusing when it's something you can leave. Yet it's interesting how many people turn up to give "moral support" to the child whom each (almost) has let down in some way. At some level they must realize it was shabby to choose personal desires over familial responsibility, and they pay the price of carefully metered "quality time" as if they were paying an excise tax imposed on their guilty pleasures.
The child would be unusual if she did not cotton on to the gamesmanship and learn how to extort attention and favors from her many emotional debtors. Is there any aspect of her character or her personally that won't be affected for the worse by living with adults who refuse to grow up? Barb is probably right that her aesthetic sense is as twisted as her childhood. I can't imagine how a pastor -- should anyone ever happen to have that relationship to the child -- would begin to straighten what has been spiritually bent.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Mar. 22, 2006 1:03 AM ET USA
"Real perverted, twisted stuff"? (First of all, it's hard to take anyone seriously who uses "real" as an adverb twice in the same exposition, but I suppose that's really picayune on my part.) These are confused people who are there not to parade their differences or to grasp at revenge by seeming to live well (with whomever), but since they are "all healthy and chatting," perhaps they are united in their love and concern for the child. Perverted and twisted? C'mon!
Posted by: Ross Dee -
Mar. 21, 2006 4:58 PM ET USA
That is why divorce and remarriage is such a grave sin. There is no end to the "misfits". What do you think the same sex fiasco is going to bring to our society? Nobody seems to be outraged, just like they are not outraged about abortion. Let's get real, nothing is going to change until abortion is stopped and the lie that two men lovers and two women lovers is normal.
Posted by: rpp -
Mar. 21, 2006 2:06 PM ET USA
I look at this and wonder how the world will ever recover. Somewhere in the dark recesses of my mind I wonder if the world might actually be better movies like "Deep Impact" (about a large comet colliding with the Earth) really happened.
Posted by: -
Mar. 21, 2006 1:26 PM ET USA
I would like to add a couple of positive comments here: There are those who would state this child, loved albeit confused - would have been a prime candidate for abortion. I for one am glad they brought the child into the world. Also, how many children have no parent there to watch a game? Having a crowd there of parents and parent figures may cause her to feel odd perhaps, but not unloved. God can make straight all the spiritual "bentness" she has undergone.
Posted by: patriot6908 -
Mar. 21, 2006 8:41 AM ET USA
Those of us who have sinned badly this way made the choice between good and evil, and chose wrongly. There were severe consequences for us and our children.. But the shepherds of the Church, who should have stormed the gates of the social hell built by the sexual revolution, preferred to stay silent and spout platitudes while their flocks got suckered by the new American Dream. We needed to hear them, as civil society did. We heard almost nothing. Father, forgive us.
Posted by: Eagle -
Mar. 21, 2006 7:30 AM ET USA
In reference to what a Pastor could do, I suggest that the most probably effective strategy would be: 1.) Allow the young woman to talk about the chaos so that, by talking, and effective questioning, a clarity, rather than justification of the chaos, would emerge; then, 2.) Give, as an alternative to the chaos, the Way. This would contrast loyalty to betrayal, commitment to self-interest, love to pleasure; nurturing to abandonment. The choice is then clear. After, it's "prayer and fasting".