Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

how reassuring

By Phil Lawler (bio - articles ) | Oct 17, 2005

Writing for Opinion Journal, John Fund finally provides an answer to the question everyone is asking: Some Evangelical leaders apparently did receive assurances that Harriet Miers would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. But the assurance did not come from Miers herself.

During a conference call, Fund reports:

Then an unidentified voice asked the two men, "Based on your personal knowledge of her, if she had the opportunity, do you believe she would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade?"

"Absolutely," said Judge Kinkeade.

"I agree with that," said Justice Hecht. "I concur."

OK. Two friends think they can predict how she will vote. That's worth something. But how much?

Back in 1990, I had the opportunity to speak with the White House Chief of Staff about a Supreme Court nominee. John Sununu-- the former governor of the state where the nominee had served as attorney general and judge-- gave me his assurance that I could "absolutely" count on pro-life votes from Justice David Souter.

That doesn't mean that Harriet Miers would vote the same way Souter has voted. But neither does the testimony of her friends convince me that she wouldn't. We just don't know.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our August expenses ($33,297 to go):
$35,000.00 $1,703.25
95% 5%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 1 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Gil125 - Oct. 17, 2005 4:49 PM ET USA

    Might one add that President Bush's assurance that she will be the same twenty years hence as she is today would have more weight if she were the same today as she was 20 years ago? In that time, she has gone from being a Catholic to being a Protestant and from being a Democrat to being a Republican. Maybe he ought to wait another 20 years to see how her views stand up.

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Another argument for reform in the Roman Curia 11 hours ago
A Diocese in Paraguay 12 hours ago
Apologies: The danger in lamenting what everyone laments 15 hours ago
Talk to your kids about porn! 21 hours ago
Showing the Courage to battle homosexual impulses July 31

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
New management, new changes coming for reformed Vatican bank CWN - July 8
Sweeping reforms to Vatican's media, financial operations CWN - July 9
‘Even Genghis Khan didn’t do this’: Mosul emptied of Christians CWN - July 21