Challenge Grant: Our Boosters will match donations up to $45,000. We have $40,640 to go. Please donate!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

What is a "preferential option"?

By Diogenes (articles ) | Oct 14, 2005

We've heard a lot in the last few decades about the Church's "preferential option for the poor." It sounds like a good thing, and in what follows I am not questioning the Church's social teaching. I am questioning the grammatical construction of that phrase.

What is a "preferential option"?

I certainly can understand how someone might get "preferential treatment." Someone receives such and such treatment, which is preferable to other treatment he might receive. That usage makes sense to me. But to say someone gets a preferential option: what does that mean? Doesn't "option" imply at least two choices? I've tried replacing the word "option" with the word "choice." A preferential choice for the poor? Choice of what for the poor? And then what is a non-preferential option? Musing on that problem, I tried a Google search of "preferential option for the poor," to see if I'd find an explanation. One helpful site told me that the phrase alludes to the Church's "special care for the poor."

OK; fine. "Special care for the poor." Now that I understand. It's good social teaching and also good grammar. I have a preferential option for that usage.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($128,327 to go):
$150,000.00 $21,672.70
86% 14%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 1 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Oct. 14, 2005 12:46 PM ET USA

    My suspicion is that the phrase, the meaning of which has bedeviled me for some time, came from an intoxicated priest under the influence of Mary Gail Frawley-O'Dea, or her clone, or her test-tube baby sister, or the tatooed, "multiply pierced" (the poor thing must have meant "multi-pierced" or "with muliple piercings") sociopath in a camouflage jacket -- you know, the Christ-like reincarnation. "Marginalized" and "disenfranchised" should be preferentially dropped from decent discourse.

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

When Catholics are less Catholic than non-Catholics 4 hours ago
Cardinal Kasper's nose is growing again October 18
Challenge Grant Begins as Synod Ends October 17
What's wrong with this Synod, IV: Unprepared for marriage October 17
No, mainstream religious orders aren't attracting vocations as fast as younger traditional orders October 17

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Key synod report calls for 'gradualism' in Church response to irregular family situations CWN - October 13
As synod concludes, bishops issue message, approve document; Pope weighs in CWN - 14 hours ago
Cardinal Parolin: UN must protect innocents from Islamic State CWN - September 30
Synod of Bishops opens with Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica CWN - October 6