Your gift counts double until 5/31: $23,238 to go in our Easter Campaign. Please help now!
 Off the Record

What is a "preferential option"?

By Diogenes (articles ) | October 14, 2005 10:25 AM

We've heard a lot in the last few decades about the Church's "preferential option for the poor." It sounds like a good thing, and in what follows I am not questioning the Church's social teaching. I am questioning the grammatical construction of that phrase.

What is a "preferential option"?

I certainly can understand how someone might get "preferential treatment." Someone receives such and such treatment, which is preferable to other treatment he might receive. That usage makes sense to me. But to say someone gets a preferential option: what does that mean? Doesn't "option" imply at least two choices? I've tried replacing the word "option" with the word "choice." A preferential choice for the poor? Choice of what for the poor? And then what is a non-preferential option? Musing on that problem, I tried a Google search of "preferential option for the poor," to see if I'd find an explanation. One helpful site told me that the phrase alludes to the Church's "special care for the poor."

OK; fine. "Special care for the poor." Now that I understand. It's good social teaching and also good grammar. I have a preferential option for that usage.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Easter Campaign:
Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($23,238 to go):
$80,000.00 $56,762.50
29% 71%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 1 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Oct. 14, 2005 12:46 PM ET USA

    My suspicion is that the phrase, the meaning of which has bedeviled me for some time, came from an intoxicated priest under the influence of Mary Gail Frawley-O'Dea, or her clone, or her test-tube baby sister, or the tatooed, "multiply pierced" (the poor thing must have meant "multi-pierced" or "with muliple piercings") sociopath in a camouflage jacket -- you know, the Christ-like reincarnation. "Marginalized" and "disenfranchised" should be preferentially dropped from decent discourse.

Think with the Catholic Leaders: Subscribe to Catholic Culture Insights Newsletter
Donate to Support this Site: Your contribution will be put to good work.
Tour the CatholicCulture.org Site
Shop Amazon to Raise Money for Catholic Culture

Recent Catholic Commentary

Fr. Thadeus Nguyen Van Ly: Your Letter May Help 0 hours ago
The Rise and Fall of the (American?) Church 19 hours ago
The Ideal of Pope Francis: the Servant Church May 23
The sad decline of self-government May 22
That impromptu exorcism again May 22

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope strongly supports call for reform in religious life CWN - May 8