more to the history
By Fr. Wilson (articles ) | May 05, 2003 6:57 PM
Yes, but there is even more to the history than that, I think, Jeff.
It was always our understanding that for much of Tschoepe's reign, whole areas of administration had been removed from his purview and given to the Vicar General, Robert Rehkemper. That was how they got around the delicate question of a bishop not quite able to perform in some areas. I think the usual answer to Domenico's question is the coadjutor option: appoint a coadjutor who is then given whole areas of responsibility (finances, seminary formation, tribunal) which then are no longer under the Diocesan.
But I still believe that the Pope can remove a bishop. Canon 416 says that a see becomes vacant upon death, resignation accepted by the Holy See, transfer, "or by deprivation noted to the bishop."
Well, whom do you think would be doing the 'depriving' and 'notifying?' It's not me -- I'd have done about 310 of these things already and would just be pausing to catch my breath (somehow, I don't think it's Fr Mankowski either!).
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our March expenses ($27,157 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!