By Diogenes (articles ) | August 31, 2005 10:18 AM
The Archdiocese of Boston has released Msgr. Paul McInerny from pastoral duties in order to study in Rome and serve as secretary for Cardinal Law:
Asked why the archdiocese is paying one of its priests to be secretary to the disgraced ex-archbishop, archdiocese spokesman Terrence C. Donilon said, "I would only deduce nothing more than monsignor's desire to resume his studies in Rome and the fact he has worked with the cardinal previously.' ...
"Why, when we have a shortage of priests, are we exporting a monsignor to serve a man who resigned from this archdiocese in disgrace, and doing it at our own expense?" said Peter Borre, a member of the Council of Parishes, a group opposed to local church closings. "Boston Catholics have met all of their obligations to Bernard Law, and owe him nothing."
Point taken. It's a pity Peter Borre was the one to make it. It's unclear from the story how much financial support McInerny will get from the Archdiocese, but at the very least his departure for Rome means one less man to say Mass, hear confessions, do marriage prep -- in short, to help a sinking parish stay afloat. Of course, some might argue that Monsignor's Roman studies will offset the loss by giving the Church a better-educated pastoral minister down the line.
"Cardinal Law is the best thing that's ever happened to the church in Boston in terms of leadership,' McInerny told one reporter in the heat of the scandal in 2002.
A quick learner? You make the call.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($15,989 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Sep. 01, 2005 3:34 PM ET USA
Look, I'm a Bostonian and I desperately want to get beyond the recriminations but here's a prime example of why the Cardinal Law neuralgia won't go away. In the first instance, he should never have been awarded the Basilica. Msgr. McInerny's posting is another insider's sweetheart deal made through the clerical old-boy system. Trust me. It demoralizes the faithful while giving the dissidents more ammo. Is it savagery to say so or is it speaking the truth in love?
Posted by: 123456 -
Aug. 31, 2005 12:25 PM ET USA
I have spoken up in support of the embattled Cardinal Law many times before here. I do so again. I am a Boston native. Fr. McInerny had it right "in the heat of the scandal in 2002," & his assessment, in my eyes, remains true & accurate today. The implication that Cardinal Law should discharge without assistance the duties of a rector of one of the greatest basilicas in the Catholic world is worse than mean-spirited. It approaches savagery. JP II & Ben XVI admired & admire Law. Rightly so.