the ever more slippery slope
By Diogenes (articles ) | August 25, 2005 9:32 AM
The latest addition to the Newspeak lexicon: "family balancing."
|
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus: Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you! |
Easter Campaign: Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($25,719 to go):
$80,000.00
$54,280.55
32%
68%
|
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
-
Posted by: Meg Q -
Aug. 25, 2005 7:23 PM ET USA
I like the attitude . . . "Of course, we Brits [Westerners] would never mess this up like the wogs would."
-
Posted by: -
Aug. 25, 2005 1:14 PM ET USA
Evidence from other countries does indeed support how unbalanced things can get...look at China.
-
Posted by: frjimc -
Aug. 25, 2005 11:23 AM ET USA
I just love the way the pro-aborts make up their "statistics" as they go along: "And the evidence from other countries is that very few parents would actively seek out sex selection — certainly not enough to tip the demographic balance either way. In America, sex selection has been available since 1995 for family balancing, but has been used only by about 2,000 couples." Anyone know where that number came from? Or is it like the number of back-alley deaths Nathanson admits fabricating?
