Open season on Chinese Catholics
By Diogenes (articles ) | Aug 19, 2005
Li Hua Zheng was frightened.
A Chinese Catholic, she was at Mass one day in 2000 when police burst through the door, seeking to arrest the priest. Zheng helped the priest to escape through a basement door, brought him to her grandmother's house, and then-- fearing official discovery and reprisals on her family-- to the home of a cousin in another province. From there, the priest went back to ministry in the underground Church.
Zheng still had a problem, however. The police, having torn down the church where Mass was being celebrated on that fateful day, were now searching for her. Afraid to return home, she made her way instead to the US, where she filed for asylum, saying that she was a victim of religious persecution.
Her case is pretty clear, right?
Wrong, according to Judge Sandra Lea Lynch of the federal First Circuit appeals court. Judge Lynch upheld the decision by immigration authorities to deny asylum, explaining that "there is no evidence that her flight was spurred by government action."
Huh? Did I miss something?
Judge Lynch explains that "the storming of the village church by unarmed officials was apparently targeted at the priest and seemed to have nothing to do with Zheng."
Except, maybe, that Zheng was an underground Catholic, now harboring an outlaw priest.
Judge Lynch (who, by the way, graduated from Wellesley one year before Hillary Clinton, and was appointed to the federal bench by Hillary's husband) goes on: "Given that Zheng was never detained or harmed, nor even ever threatened with detainment or harm, we are hardly compelled to find… that she was subject to past persecution."
It's not persecution, you see, unless they catch you. Of course if they do catch you, you probably won't have the chance to seek asylum in the US; Chinese authorities will have other plans for your future. So by the logic of the aptly named Judge Lynch, there's no such thing as persecution against Catholics in China.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Cantor Rich -
Aug. 20, 2005 12:11 AM ET USA
Oh, this is all perfectly logical: Christians have no right to asylum because it is merely religious intolerance they are attempting to escape; Illegals are fleeing POVERTY, hence all of the concern for their welfare by the liberals and the USCCB. In this they out-conservative the conservatives. One more thing: Am I the only one who has noticed more concern for members of Falun Gong in the liberal press, vis-a-vis governmental persecution, than for underground Catholics?
Posted by: Abraham Tolemahcs -
Aug. 19, 2005 5:23 PM ET USA
We know there's no prosecution of Catholics in China; a Federal Judge said so right? So she sends Ms. Zheng back to China where she will certainly be escorted from the plane by a friendly representative from the local re-education center but we'll just let all the illegal aliens stay here as long as they want.