Challenge Grant: Our Boosters will match donations up to $45,000. We have $40,100 to go. Please donate!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

a world upside down

By Diogenes (articles ) | Aug 08, 2005

The issue surfaces in Sydney.

A doctor accused of inducing a late-term abortion has become the first medical practitioner in NSW to be charged over a termination since 1971. Dr Suman Sood is also believed to be the state's first doctor to be charged with the manslaughter of a foetus.

The Sydney doctor allegedly gave a 20-year-old woman an abortion drug. The woman gave birth to a baby that survived for about three hours.

The abortionist is being prosecuted on baffling technical grounds ("she failed to find out if a continuation [sic!] of the pregnancy would pose a danger to the woman's physical or mental health, or economic and social well-being"), but the manslaughter charge implies a recognition that the life that was lost was a human life. The news story is not very lucid, but it seems to suggest that, in the eye of the law, the abortionist is faulted for not being a conventionally efficient murderess, whence the manslaughter charge is all the more strange.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($127,593 to go):
$150,000.00 $22,406.70
85% 15%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 2 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: extremeCatholic - Aug. 10, 2005 1:52 PM ET USA

    This is bizarre. Since the mother sought the abortion, the doctor typically is only the agent of the mother's intent, i.e. her right to kill the unborn child. Why not charge her as well?

  • Posted by: TheJournalist64 - Aug. 08, 2005 8:23 PM ET USA

    I wonder if Judge Ginsberg of our Supreme Court will, in her dissent against the overturning of Roe v. Wade, cite this case from international law?

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Cardinal Kasper's unsubtle threat 1 hours ago
When Catholics are less Catholic than non-Catholics 22 hours ago
Cardinal Kasper's nose is growing again October 18
Challenge Grant Begins as Synod Ends October 17
What's wrong with this Synod, IV: Unprepared for marriage October 17

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Key synod report calls for 'gradualism' in Church response to irregular family situations CWN - October 13
As synod concludes, bishops issue message, approve document; Pope weighs in CWN - October 20
Cardinal Parolin: UN must protect innocents from Islamic State CWN - September 30
Synod of Bishops opens with Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica CWN - October 6