Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

whatever ...

By Diogenes (articles ) | Jul 13, 2005

Edward Saunders, the new lobbyist for the Massachusetts Catholic Conference, has come under some criticism for his questionable loyalties in those matters where Catholic teaching diverges from the Democratic Party platform.

Saunders, a registered Democrat and a longtime lobbyist on Beacon Hill, declined to discuss his personal views on social issues, saying only, "Whatever the position of the church is, that's my position."

It's the old story of the missionary nun quizzing a rice Christian on the catechism: "How many persons are there in the Trinity?" "As many as you say, Sister." On one level, a lobbyist is understood to have professional and transient loyalties, like the rented advocacy one gets from a lawyer or an advertising agency, and Saunders's adaptability is typical of his breed. Yet the accusation is often made by the Church's adversaries that her leaders don't really believe her teachings but simply pretend to do so for political or personal advantage. As the controversies over same-sex marriage, abortion, and embryo destruction heat up in Massachusetts, it's dismaying that the bishops couldn't have found a more convinced Catholic as their de facto spokesman, and that the man they did hire should have begun his work with such an obtuse concession to his client's most formidable opponents. "Hey, are we against cloning? Somebody find out and leave the answer on my voicemail."

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our September expenses ($20,259 to go):
$35,000.00 $14,740.73
58% 42%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 6 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Jul. 14, 2005 7:32 AM ET USA

    Bill Clinton could at least SOUND convincing.

  • Posted by: - Jul. 13, 2005 5:55 PM ET USA

    I don't know why you people are so excited about the Saunders situation. After all, everything is relative, isn't it? At least that seems to be what our episcopal leadership seems to think. Please, bishops, prove me wrong!

  • Posted by: - Jul. 13, 2005 2:51 PM ET USA

    You have to hire a paid shill to insincerely parrot church teaching in Ma.? We are more close with our money here in Los Angeles....we just have the cardinal do it. No extra charge....

  • Posted by: - Jul. 13, 2005 11:13 AM ET USA

    Yes, it's dismaying the MA bishops can't find a loyal and convincing shill. But even more dismaying is that they themselves fail to speak clearly, unequivocally and with conviction.

  • Posted by: - Jul. 13, 2005 10:55 AM ET USA

    No, Phil. The bishops of Mass. are.

  • Posted by: Phil - Jul. 13, 2005 10:33 AM ET USA

    Is Edward Saunders related to Rex Mottram?

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Scotland demonstrates the provisional nature of sovereignty 0 hours ago
Targeting the Pope? 18 hours ago
Gregory the Great, Christ, the Church and the Soul in the Song of Songs 20 hours ago
New Ebook on Renewal and Evangelization September 15
More evidence that you can't trust the Pill September 15

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days