Challenge Grant: Our Boosters will match donations up to $45,000. We have $40,415 to go. Please donate!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

recluse diocese

By Diogenes (articles ) | Jul 05, 2005

In Springfield, Massachusetts,

Diocesan spokesman Mark E. Dupont said the current bishop stands by his position that the diocese doesn't release personal information about personnel - clergy or lay.

That's a reasonable, prudent policy-- so long as we're talking about personal information.

Now when you meet someone for the first time, strike up a conversation, and he casually asks you where you live, do you think he's being nosy? Is that an impertinent personal question?

In this case it's transparently obvious why the diocese doesn't want to give out information. The current bishop is protecting the former bishop. Why?

That protection is embarrassing to the Church, and destructive to the cause of evangelization. It's certainly undeserved, and just as certainly unnecessary. No principle is being served here; no Catholic doctrine or discipline is under attack. A few folks have a valid reason to want Bishop Dupre's current mailing address; that's all.

If we lived in a society that openly persecuted the Church, and Bishop Dupre was the object of unjust prosecution, we'd heartily endorse whatever subterfuge or outright defiance the Springfield diocese used to protect him. Protecting him from just prosecution (or, if the statute of limitation prevents that, lawsuits) is quite another thing.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($128,102 to go):
$150,000.00 $21,897.70
85% 15%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 3 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Jul. 07, 2005 9:23 AM ET USA

    I thought the bishops were going to apply the sex abuse policy to themselves. So why aren't any of these bishops being "laicized"?

  • Posted by: Pseudodionysius - Jul. 06, 2005 9:40 PM ET USA

    The only way that Invertebrate Bishops will change is if frustrated and loopy plaintiff's start trying to sue the Vatican, Bishop B16 and all of his deceased predecessors for the sins of these miscreants. Until then, expect "hide the Parish Directory" as the only pass pattern these passing fancies understand.

  • Posted by: - Jul. 05, 2005 6:51 PM ET USA

    If I were suing the former bishop, I would name him in the complaint. If I did not have a good address for service of process, I would subpoena the diocese's personnel records. That would shift the burden on the diocese to move for a protective order preventing me from releasing the address to uninterested third parties.

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

When Catholics are less Catholic than non-Catholics 18 hours ago
Cardinal Kasper's nose is growing again October 18
Challenge Grant Begins as Synod Ends October 17
What's wrong with this Synod, IV: Unprepared for marriage October 17
No, mainstream religious orders aren't attracting vocations as fast as younger traditional orders October 17

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Key synod report calls for 'gradualism' in Church response to irregular family situations CWN - October 13
As synod concludes, bishops issue message, approve document; Pope weighs in CWN - October 20
Cardinal Parolin: UN must protect innocents from Islamic State CWN - September 30
Synod of Bishops opens with Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica CWN - October 6