unclear on the doctrine
By Diogenes (articles ) | April 16, 2005 5:13 AM
High dudgeon highbrow prophesying from His Holiness, a biography of Pope John Paul II, by Carl Bernstein (1996), p. 408.
"A lot of people feel, rather than this heavy-handed dogmatic approach, he should take a pastoral approach," says Father Vincent O'Keefe, a former vicar general of the Jesuits who has had his own struggles with Wojtyla. "In the United States we have a lot of Catholics who are divorced. The pope says the doctrine has to be clear. Well, the doctrine is too damned clear! That's not the problem. How do you deal with these people? How do you help these people? Is there no help for them? Do you say, 'Well, you can come to the Church but you can't partake in communion'? It's the same with people who practice contraception or abortion. How do you deal with these people? What kind of hope do you hold out for them?
O'Keefe, like many American bishops, believes the pope has a cultural bias, that "he has a really deep antagonism to the West, certainly towards the United States. I think he feels we're too materialistic, we're too loud, we talk too much, we're spoiled." The Jesuit father asks, "How available is he for this universal Church that a lot of us are looking for? That was the great thing at Vatican II."
How available was Wojtyla, you ask, for this universal Church? Well, Father O'Keefe, in view of the fact that this polyglot Pope made 104 official trips to 126 countries, attracted enormous crowds even where the host regime did its utmost to sabotage his visits, and was viewed in the flesh by roughly 150 million people in his pontificate -- his failure to win your esteem suggests that the universe to which your "universal" Church belongs is not one to which the rest of us have gained admittance.
For purposes of comparison, let's look at how the Pastoral Approach has succeeded in the congregation you rescued from Wojtyla's heavy-handed dogmatism. In 1965, at the time of the Council (according to the Annuario Pontificio), Jesuits numbered 36,038 worldwide. Today, after 40 years of making the Society of Jesus "available to this universal Church," it numbers 19,850. On a Jesuit website we read, "During the past year 512 entered, 414 died and 418 left the Society." Perhaps there's some postmodern mystical math known only to Jesuits by which this adds up to a victory for O'Keefery. Using my insular, pre-Conciliar methods of calculation, I make it out that there are 45% fewer Jesuits today than in the bad old days, with a net loss of 320 in the last year alone -- roughly a province a year up in smoke.
Further, when I look at the sort of Catholics to which your dream pontiff would extend hope -- abortion fans, contraception fans, divorce fans -- it occurs to me that by "universal" you mean what the rest of us mean by "parochial." These macabre enthusiasms for sterility and death are rife among Catholics living in your own mid-town Manhattan neighborhood, I'll grant you, but nearly unknown in Bangladesh, Guyana, and Chad. And when I read that Manhattan's St. Francis Xavier parish invited "Ducky" from a sex-aids shop called Toys in Babeland to address its Catholic Lesbians sodality, I'm moved to wonder whether you're confusing the theological virtue of hope with some other concept. Vaseline, maybe?
Subverting Church teaching must be no end of fun for the subversives, but institutionally it's a precarious basis for long-term growth. Steyn's Doctrine has it that "the design flaw of the radical secular welfare state is that it depends on a traditionally religious society birthrate to sustain it." Let me recast it in ecclesial/catechetical terms. If your dreams came true, if we had a series of progressive popes cheerfully pulling condoms over zucchini before a roomful of enthralled fifth-graders, in the space of two generations there'll be no fifth-graders left to enthrall. The design flaw of your Pastoral Approach ought to be evident in the contrast between, on the one hand, the demographics of the Society of Jesus, and, on the other, the omniracial omnilingual multitudes that crowded into Rome to say their farewells to Pope John Paul.
Still clueless? Ask Ducky to explain it for you.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our final 2013 goal ($25,879 to go, assuming receipt of matching funds):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: John J Plick -
Apr. 17, 2005 10:14 PM ET USA
"...certainly towards the United States. I think he feels we're too materialistic, we're too loud, we talk too much, we're spoiled...." I must have missed it... In the main, what part of that description is inaccurate???
Posted by: -
Apr. 17, 2005 1:55 PM ET USA
St. Ignatius must be appalled at the state of his Jesuit order. O'Keefe is full of it. Pope John Paul II praised the U.S. constitution. But he wanted to teach us that our great freedom demands great responsibility. Satan gets his hands into every part of humanity that he possibly can. Especially when our God-given free will is so protected. I'm with a.o. & Gino we need to pray for intercessions. For every country of the world and for our Church that satan wants to destroy more than anything.
Posted by: Fr. William -
Apr. 17, 2005 12:40 AM ET USA
What Father OKeefe and other subversives seem to have done for the Church is to practice vocational contraception. OKeefe and others in his camp can join the Protestants if that's the route they want to take. In the meantime, let's keep praying for the intercession of Pope John Paul II, the Great, and for the Cardinal electors to be open to such intercession, and for the man who will be our next Holy Father.
Posted by: Brad -
Apr. 16, 2005 11:25 PM ET USA
"I think he feels we're too materialistic, we're too loud, we talk too much, we're spoiled". Ummmm..... yeah. If the shoe fits....
Posted by: www.inquisition.ca -
Apr. 16, 2005 8:02 PM ET USA
That is it. I was headed for it, but now it has happened: I go on the Catholic World News site, not for the news, but for the hilarious rants of Diogenes! Diogenes for Pope!
Posted by: Ignacio177 -
Apr. 16, 2005 1:50 PM ET USA
Please do not quote Vinny O'Keefe anymore; the poor thing has long ago entered into his dotage.
Posted by: -
Apr. 16, 2005 1:46 PM ET USA
You are so right ! The great, big, bleating, multitude of dissenters who feel so subjected to adverse discrimination, are really a tiny fragmented minority. Their presence is remarkably absent in most of the world: we find them almost exclusively in parts of North America and Western Europe. The only reply they deserve (and so sorely need) is quite simple and clear: REPENT ! ! !
Posted by: -
Apr. 16, 2005 1:30 PM ET USA
More Jesuit "LIBERAL THEOLOGY". As Diogenes says it's worked so well for their order why not try it out on the rest of the Church. Instead of the 25% now going to Mass we could bring it down to 10%. St. Ignatius pray for them!