Those danged pro-lifers
By Diogenes (articles ) | March 28, 2005 9:50 AM
As he told Newsweek what a fine idea it would be to starve Terri Schiavo, the Rev. John ("Pull the plug") Paris, SJ, had angry words for the "radical right-to-life segment of thinking" that dares to disagree with him.
Among its many other faults, Paris suggests, is the willingness of the pro-movement to twist the words of Pope John Paul II, regarding the provision of food and water (or "nutrition and hydration," if you want to make it sound more technical) to patients who are unconscious.
Father Paris charges:
What the right-to-lifers want to say is, the Pope said you must always use artificial nutrition and fluids for patients in persistent vegetative state—and there’s no exception.
OK; that's what the "right-to-lifers" want you to think the Pope said. So what did the Pope say? Here it is:
I should like particularly to underline how the administration of water and food, even when provided by artificial means, always represents a natural means of preserving life, not a medical act.
Do you notice a whole lot of difference? Neither do I.
By the way, the Pope stated clearly that such care is “ordinary and proportionate, and as such morally obligatory.” I think I know what "morally obligatory" means, but maybe Father Paris could help us understand a bit better.
One more thing: In that same speech, Pope John Paul indicated his extreme distaste for the use of the term "persistent vegetative state." He said: “A man, even if seriously ill or disabled in the exercise of his highest functions, is and always will be a man, and he will never become a ‘vegetable’ or an ‘animal.’”
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our March expenses ($27,157 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Ignacio177 -
Mar. 28, 2005 7:32 PM ET USA
It would appear the John Paris failed theological anthropology in the Sem. . A human being has an inmortal soul. It is not a capacity, not a function, not an ability that makes a person human. It is his soul. Terri Schiavo is not brain dead. Her soul (substancial form and the form of the body) and body are united. That is defined dogma. She is owed water and food as much as any other living human being .
Posted by: -
Mar. 28, 2005 6:17 PM ET USA
Fr. Paris must have the ICEL translation of the Pope's comments.
Posted by: patriot6908 -
Mar. 28, 2005 10:33 AM ET USA
It's known as solipsism: If I think that the Pope said what I think he should have said, then he said what I said. Father Paris' reality exists solely between the ears of Father Paris. The man is a stunning example of contemporary cognition sputtering towards empty.