Action Alert!


By Fr. Wilson (articles ) | Feb 07, 2005

Diogenes, there was an interesting assertion in that Dallas Morning News story:

"A lawyer wrote the bishop in 1993 to say that Father Richard had been sexually harassing several boys at a Dallas Catholic high school and a Plano church. Sworn statements from three boys followed, describing unwanted looks, requests, comments and massages of the chest, back and shoulders."

So. I gather that, even after the Dallas Charter was adopted, Bishop Grahmann continued in office a pastor who had been credibly accused of improprieties with youth?

Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 4 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Feb. 08, 2005 11:18 AM ET USA

    Is this the same Bishop Grahmann that didn't want his co-adjutor to succeed him after all the earlier sexual abuse problems of the clergy? I hope the coadjutor is now happier in Camden.

  • Posted by: - Feb. 08, 2005 10:06 AM ET USA

    When I think of how easy it would be for someone to totally wreck the life of a priest just because they didn't like him, I am hesitant to jump to conclusions because of as yet unproven improprieties. If a priest were wrongly accused, how could he ever redeem his name? Don't get me wrong. As a member of the Dallas Diocese, I am aware of many ignored or continuing improprieties over the last 30 years. But I don't understand how anyone endures long-term abuse without sharing the fault.

  • Posted by: frjimc - Feb. 07, 2005 1:10 PM ET USA

    In re the comment by latinae: ONLY two episcopal liars?

  • Posted by: - Feb. 07, 2005 1:04 PM ET USA

    Does that mean two episcopal liars for the weekend?