Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

DALLAS STORY

By Fr. Wilson (articles ) | Feb 07, 2005

Diogenes, there was an interesting assertion in that Dallas Morning News story:

"A lawyer wrote the bishop in 1993 to say that Father Richard had been sexually harassing several boys at a Dallas Catholic high school and a Plano church. Sworn statements from three boys followed, describing unwanted looks, requests, comments and massages of the chest, back and shoulders."

So. I gather that, even after the Dallas Charter was adopted, Bishop Grahmann continued in office a pastor who had been credibly accused of improprieties with youth?

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our July expenses ($33,425 to go):
$35,000.00 $1,574.95
96% 4%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 4 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Feb. 08, 2005 11:18 AM ET USA

    Is this the same Bishop Grahmann that didn't want his co-adjutor to succeed him after all the earlier sexual abuse problems of the clergy? I hope the coadjutor is now happier in Camden.

  • Posted by: - Feb. 08, 2005 10:06 AM ET USA

    When I think of how easy it would be for someone to totally wreck the life of a priest just because they didn't like him, I am hesitant to jump to conclusions because of as yet unproven improprieties. If a priest were wrongly accused, how could he ever redeem his name? Don't get me wrong. As a member of the Dallas Diocese, I am aware of many ignored or continuing improprieties over the last 30 years. But I don't understand how anyone endures long-term abuse without sharing the fault.

  • Posted by: frjimc - Feb. 07, 2005 1:10 PM ET USA

    In re the comment by latinae: ONLY two episcopal liars?

  • Posted by: - Feb. 07, 2005 1:04 PM ET USA

    Does that mean two episcopal liars for the weekend?

Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Making Moral Progress? July 3
Vatican statement clarifies duties of Catholic faithful after Obergefell decision July 2
Political battles vs. sacrificial service: The Brooks paradox revisited July 2
A Baptist leader with a message the Synod of Bishops should hear June 30
'Helpful' advice for social conservatives: ignore causes, deal with effects June 30

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope approves process for holding bishops accountable in abuse cases CWN - June 10
Pope Francis’ 2nd encyclical released (includes link to full text) CWN - June 18
US Supreme Court rules all states must recognize same-sex marriage CWN - June 26
Archbishop Nienstedt, auxiliary bishop resign CWN - June 15