Don't confuse us with the facts
The front-page Boston Globe story begins:
As HIV infections start to climb again among gay men and young adults, the federal government is moving to impose restrictions on AIDS education...
That's a great lead, by Globe standards. You already know the "bad guy" (the federal government), and you can easily identify the "good guys"-- the people who want to stop HIV infections. Why on earth would the government restrict AIDS education? Let's read on. The sentence continues:
...that would require campaigns to discuss the "lack of effectiveness" of condoms and subject explicit materials to high-level scrutiny from state public health authorities ...
Oh. The "restriction" is that the feds want AIDS education to be accurate.
And we still aren't finished with that first sentence:
-- measures that critics argue would impede efforts to prevent the disease.
Now we have the whole picture. Teaching only the facts is a "restrictive" approach. To prevent the spread of disease, we'll need to add a healthy dollop of liberal ideology. And if the facts conflict with the ideology, you know which will have to go.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our final 2013 goal ($19,641 to go, assuming receipt of matching funds):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: AveMaria580 -
Sep. 20, 2004 11:21 AM ET USA
Of course, the most restrictive approach is teaching abstinence because condoms do not really help to prevent AIDS. Also, there are also the gays who deliberately look for those who are already determines to be HIV carriers. Unprotected sex with such men is considered the ultimate sexual and sensual experience. How many more millions must be spent looking for a cure for self indulgent deviant sex? How much longer must we live with the Tyranny of the neurotic? And, I don't mean just gays.
Posted by: -
Sep. 20, 2004 10:48 AM ET USA
Once again a 'head in the sand' approach to treat the symptom rather than the disease. They should recall the old joke: Doctor: "Does it hurt when you do that?" Patient: "Yes" Doctor: "Then, don't do that..."