celebrating diversity: they play, you pay.
The U.S. bishops will once more be gazing with interest at events unfolding in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, now that a judge rejected Cardinal Mahony's desperation claim that clergy personnel records are protected by 1st Amendment guarantees, and because the Archdiocese's financial liability for clerical sexual abuse has been estimated as many times greater than earlier supposed.
Of course it's possible that Cardinal Mahony's reluctance to turn over the records is motivated purely by principle, and that they will reveal no misdeeds, sexual or administrative, on the part of LA clergy and bishops, but instead bring to light pages of edifying spiritual solicitude ("Dear Father Michael, I am concerned that the rigors of your Lenten fast might render you too weak for the demands of the Holy Week triduum, whence I am enclosing some passages I copied out from the sermons of Gregory of Nyssa for your prayerful consideration...").
Possible, but not likely-- at least according to those whose business it is to gauge the probabilities. A 2001 Crisis article by Dan Michalski reports that
The Evanston Insurance Company (affiliated with Lloyds of London) now underwrites a policy specifically tailored to churches and clergy that covers "any act of unlawful sexual intimacy, sexual molestation or sexual assault" up to $1 million. That means dioceses can now obtain insurance, at a cost of about $2,500 per cleric per year, against criminal acts.
This figure merits some pious reflection. The World Bank reports that the average per capita income in Haiti is $250 per annum. That means that the orders and dioceses covered under the Evanston Plan (note that the price is pre-Scandal, and is not likely to have diminished in the meantime) shell out annually, for each one of their priests, the yearly earnings of ten Haitians, just to pay the premiums on the boy-boffing insurance. The premiums!
With the Bernardin Ascendancy at the NCCB, the bishops have kept up a non-stop patter of moralizing about our obligations in social justice, especially our duty to relieve extremes of poverty at home and abroad. In itself, this instruction is not a bad thing. But how can the bishops fail to make a connection between their abstract concern for the indigent and their grotesque self-indulgence in the area of sexual mischief -- an indulgence concretely humored in the monies-not-their-own paid out for victim therapy, abuser therapy, attorneys' fees, punitive damages, protease inhibitors, and, as Michalski points out, insurance against boundary-crossing?
Next time your diocese hits you up for a major pledge, try this: write out a check for $250 and leave the payee space blank. Then ask yourself, "I can put this into the hands of my local chancery or send it to Mother Teresa's sisters. In which case is the money likely to accomplish those purposes for which I wish to contribute to my Church?" Call it the Haitian Ration.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our September expenses ($33,525 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Sep. 11, 2004 10:28 AM ET USA
Recently one of my sons had a situation with a parish priest regarding my son's 12 year old daughter. I tried to get an explanation from the priest and he sent me a couple of lines stating that I didn't know what I was talking about and just brushed me off. I wrote to his pastor and repeated my request for an explanation. No answer! I wrote to the regional vicar. No answer! My question is this. Are some priests above dialogue with the lowly laity??
Posted by: Pseudodionysius -
Sep. 10, 2004 10:29 AM ET USA
Et tu, Cardinal?
Posted by: -
Sep. 10, 2004 12:12 AM ET USA
Ed Keating (no conservative) decried the "mafia" atmosphere in the LA Archdiocese, presumably the "lavender mafia". He got his neck wrung. One begins to suspect that if the lid ever blows on that place it will make Boston look like Little House on the Prairie. Remeember that the infamous Bishop Ziemann of Santa Rosa was a "protege" of Cdl. Mahoney. Not the only one, just the only one to get caught. so far.
Posted by: -
Sep. 09, 2004 9:09 PM ET USA
I have already informed my Diocese that next year's Bishop' Appeal will be lighter. I will send in half my usual donation and give the rest to Fr. Pavone's Priests for Life.since the Bishop's seem to not really try hard to protect the innocent!
Posted by: AveMaria580 -
Sep. 09, 2004 4:04 PM ET USA
Thank you. I actually started using the Haitian Ration last year. It wasn't so much because of the sex abuse scandal because the diocese I am in had very little of that. The few cases were dealt with immediately and by removal of the offenders. The problem is the increasing amount of damage done in this diocese to the Liturgy, education and catechesis by gender feminists. They are unchecked. Whatever I have to give goes to orders and organizations that work with the poor.
Posted by: -
Sep. 09, 2004 3:36 PM ET USA
Tut, tut! His Eminence, Cardinal Mahony, should look upon this "tempest" as the means by which our memories are being purified of the errors and scandals he and his cronies have foisted upon all of us!