Zany, vibrant, dying
By Leila Marie Lawler (articles ) | Jul 05, 2004
My friend Margaret points out an article in yesterday's Boston Globe about Provincetown, a name that means Queertown. Husbands cower behind their wives when going for a hike on the dunes just inside the town line; real guys don't like having to get to close to P'town even for the sake of that empty beach after the hot walk over the beautiful rolling hills of sand. When someone tells you a bishop summers there, a nod's as good as a wink, what?
The story is forthright the town's problems that lurk beneath the bright exterior -- and about what's missing: children. Without children, a town can't survive, no matter how trendy: "The town's share of children under 10 -- an important indicator of a school system's viability -- is just 3.7 percent of its population. That ranked Provincetown last among the state's 351 communities."
Provincetown has money, it turns out, being a popular tourist destination, but money alone isn't staving off doom. ''What you're starting to see is a way of life in a community start to unravel."
The answer? Fund more arts, build a musem, expand a nursing home by turning it over to a nonprofit. The weakness of these suggestions would be laughable if not so tragically inevitable. The reporter knows, but can't find anyone in the place to say, that what Provincetown and indeed every town needs is children, families, mothers, fathers, and a Church. And that maybe homosexuality isn't a viable lifestlye after all.
Maybe sooner than we think we'll be able to afford a house on the beach...
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our July expenses ($8,498 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Jul. 06, 2004 9:17 AM ET USA
This is why the Episcopal church is going to go the way of the Shakers, who didn't reproduce themselves except by conversion and adoption. The queer thing is, that none of the upper echelon in that church seem to understand that installing a sodomite bishop sets the pattern all the way down. And they love to natter about their big evangelistic effort.
Posted by: -
Jul. 05, 2004 10:39 PM ET USA
I'm thinking an Episcopal bishop. Gene Robinson?
Posted by: -
Jul. 05, 2004 3:13 PM ET USA
Provincetown can remain "Queertown" by pushing for fast-track acceptance of sodomites wishing to immigrate from other countries. That should bolster their population until the children arrive - you know, all the queers they're cloning in secret labs in San Francisco.
Posted by: frjimc -
Jul. 05, 2004 12:42 PM ET USA
Which bishop, pray tell?