By Diogenes (articles ) | May 29, 2004
Remember David Duke, the cheerfully race-baiting Louisiana Klansman who caused a stir as a presidential candidate in 1992? Imagine for a moment that he were a Catholic as well as a Klansman and were running for office, and that he presented himself for communion. Is there is a single U.S. bishop who would allow him to receive it? Of course not. More to the point, is there a single U.S. bishop who would see his refusing Duke as "politicizing the sacrament" à la Keeler? It's more likely that the bishops would be puzzled by the question: "We're not the ones who are playing politics with the sacrament," they'd say, "David Duke is. Catholic teaching is clear." And not a single liberal columnist
Or take Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson, the Wyoming men who bound, robbed, and pistol-whipped Matthew Shepard and left him to die, making of him a gay martyr. Suppose activists in the Montana Freemen tradition (after suitable advance publicity) were to present themselves for communion wearing sashes reading "Free McKinney and Henderson!" or "Liberty for the Laramie Brothers!" Would they receive an episcopal welcome ("Our Church believes in giving people a second chance") in the dioceses currently open to the Rainbow Sash brigade? Would attempts to deny the agitators communion be roundly denounced as exclusionary or politically punitive?
Somehow I doubt it.
Just as some men hold their personal dogmas so uncritically that they think they hold no dogmas at all, so unimaginative people identify so completely with their politics that they don't recognize them as politics. Almost anyone not in violent revolt against 90% of what he sees on television belongs to the latter group. Cardinal Keeler and his colleagues are probably sincere in thinking that Archbishop Burke is "politicizing" the Eucharist by denying it to John Kerry
Remember too that, for a bishop as for anyone else, life is considerably easier when one accepts the dominant world-view on its own terms and speaks its language. In explaining his reluctance to deny communion to pro-aborts, Cardinal McCarrick was not being fanciful in putting his "comfort" front and center.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Jun. 01, 2004 11:28 PM ET USA
No Minidoc, our cardinal archbishop here in Baltimore is not an idiot. But he does like to remain popular with the hometown folk here in (generally) liberal Maryland. If His Eminence comes down on Kerry, he will also be indicting Sen. Milkulski- our scrappy pro-union, pro-abortion, pro-gay Catholic senator. That's a no-fly zone for sure. "Just look at all the good she does-- creating 'programs' that help the poor and creating jobs (for those lucky enough to be already born)" yadda yadda.
Posted by: -
May. 29, 2004 10:48 PM ET USA
It is unlikely that the Cardinal Archbishop of Baltimore is an "idiot" or a "moron," so my first reaction to his statement was quickly dismissed. As a cardinal archbishop I cannot give him the benefit of the doubt that he is "mistaken" or "ignorant" of the real issue here re: sacrilege and the honor due to the Blessed Sacrament. I am running out of options and the most likely explanation is that he doesn't believe in the concept of sacrilege and adheres to the "birthday cake" idea of Communion
Posted by: -
May. 29, 2004 8:04 PM ET USA
I recall when certain Catholics in a Southern State (was it Louisiana ?) were excommunicated for the "sin" of being segregationists, even though the Catholic Church did not seem to have any problem with that "sin" for hundreds of years before that. Our left-wing extremist political Cardinals, Bishops, theologians, and priests, slavishly serve a DOUBLE STANDARD, as they bow in cowardly fashion to the so-called "Catholic," Kerry. Pray for the miracle of their conversion to Christianity !