means & ends
By Diogenes (articles ) | Apr 18, 2004
I've read some thoughtful criticisms of OTR's approach to The Crisis, claiming we're naive in focusing so narrowly on the bishops as the pivotal issue. One reader suggested we're looking for a "quick fix," that we're the equivalent of those football fans who think all their team's problems would be solved if they just got a new quarterback.
This criticism makes an important point. Yanking bad bishops is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition of amendment. On one hand, we'd want good reason -- much stronger evidence than we have now -- to believe that the replacement bishops would be better than their predecessors; on the other hand we have to acknowledge that bad habits of churchmanship common to clergy and laity mean the impact of prayerful, gutsy, orthodox bishops would be considerably weakened, even if such bishops gained the ascendancy.
That said, it's a ground floor mistake to see The Crisis as a particularly vexatious "large-scale problem," susceptible of administrative correction in secular management terms. In the only important sense, there is no fix.
The Crisis is "unfixable" because it is not a problem that a manager can stand outside of, it's not a problem like falling sales or declining SAT scores or difficulty in retaining partners in a law firm. You don't gather in a committee room and toss the problem out on the table and brainstorm about it. It's not a question of alternative means to a given end but of alternative ends; and the contradictory, mutually exclusive ends subsist in the very persons
Reggie Cawcutt and Joseph Ratzinger are not men working in different ways toward the same goal. They want different teams to win. Sometimes our local ordinary will be a Ratzinger, sometimes a Cawcutt, most often a man who oscillates between one position and the other. Those of us who are not bishops have no say whatever in the concrete decisions made, yet we all, to a greater or lesser extent, have to play along with the fiction that we're all on the same team with the same purposes.
How do you know your bishop is not a closet Cawcutt? You don't. You can't. Even Cawcutt was a closet Cawcutt until his e-mails were hacked. Thus it happens, not infrequently, that those who love the Church are governed by those who hate her. They have a difficult path to walk without losing their honor or their faith. When it is suggested to them that a new program, or covenant, or management solution will allay their anxieties
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: John J Plick -
Apr. 20, 2004 10:29 PM ET USA
I have very strong passions with regard to leadership and I WILL NOT see the impact of good leadership trivialized without protest. First of all, a "system" or a "protocol" didn't die on the cross for us, a "leader" did, a man did, the Man-God, to be specific.It took only ONE man to redeem the world, and it took only twelve to begin its conversion. The Chiurch is led by MEN, first and foremost, made in the image and likeness of GOD, with unfathomable potential, but we prefer to idolize intellect
Posted by: extremeCatholic -
Apr. 20, 2004 8:53 AM ET USA
A system of permitting confidential evidence to be passed from witnesses to Pope regarding the conduct of bishops needs to be established such as they have in police departments, the military, etc. for lack of a better phrase call this an "inspector general". The tragic death of Fr. Minkler and the outcome of complaints given to Cacciavillan when he was nuncio (although he was by no means alone) shows that the current system is broken.
Posted by: Pseudodionysius -
Apr. 18, 2004 2:19 PM ET USA
And those of us who work in the private or public sector for simliar vacuous and trite managers can smell the dandelions much sooner than many of our compadres.
Posted by: -
Apr. 18, 2004 10:10 AM ET USA
We also need strong Universities to educate the elite (remember the early years of the Jesuits) and we need strong Universities to educate the poor (remember Georgetown, BC, Fordham, Povidence College). We don't do it anymore. We need to be more agressive. We should never compromise the faith. It is time to prune (Archbishop O'Malley is doing it) and rebuild. Lets rebuild.
Posted by: -
Apr. 18, 2004 10:05 AM ET USA
The problem seems to be the lack of patience. The Crisis will not be solved tonight, next year, or the following year. It is going to take years and it is going to painful. Look at the reforms of Trent. It took decades, even centuries to reform the Church. Yes, we need good, holy Bishops. We need good priests. We need new religious orders, we need lay movements. But the problem is our ability to reach the common people in the pews. We need strong, educated, well trained parish priests.