loss & gain
By Diogenes (articles ) | Mar 11, 2004
"Tracers work both ways," runs a military maxim, and this paradoxical truth
Anyone familiar with the situation knows that the upper echelons of the Catholic liturgical establishment have long been dominated by gay men. Formerly it was accounted bad taste to mention this, but the staggering series of influential liturgists
Representative samples are not hard to find. Theatre seating in church is Queer Eye. Coy, out-of-the-way tabernacles are Queer Eye. Vestments in the colors of Italian sherbet are Queer Eye. The makeover of the Milwaukee cathedral is Queer Eye. And to extend the metaphor somewhat ("Queer Ear" doesn't cut it), we can perceive the same aesthetic in the music of Dan Schutte and his clones.
Most of us in the English-speaking Church have watched Queer Eye come to dominate the ornamental dimension of ecclesial life; in fact, the most important limiting factor has been money. The three poorest parishes in your diocese are likely to have gothic or romanesque church buildings with damaged stained glass; the three wealthiest will probably have an open stage-like sanctuary with high-tech canister lighting, announcing to all and sundry that we are a Queer Eye people.
There was an even a Queer Eye manifesto, called Environment and Art in Catholic Worship (1978). Though it no longer has full canonical force, its heart continues to beat in terms of decision-making leverage at the parish checkbook level. In this respect
There are counter-movements, of course. Those of us with contra sympathies (be they in sacred music, or church design, or liturgical language) have remarkably similar experiences in the reception accorded our views in the sacristy or chancery. For the immediate future things are likely to get worse, but at least we can put a name to our woes.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Apologia -
Mar. 13, 2004 1:32 PM ET USA
Diogenes, In 6 paragraphs, and with "un-gloved hands", you've stated it so brutally and truthfully. Face it. We all know it. My fellow "posters" know it too. The problem is that there aren't enough Catholics educated enough to know the difference or know the wool has been pulled over their eyes. It's also a problem in the convents. (See Donna Steichen's "Ungodly Rage") The salvation of the priesthood may come from the ranks of the younger men who are so much more orthodox than their elders.
Posted by: -
Mar. 11, 2004 5:01 PM ET USA
Diogenes: When I read Michael Rose’s Goodbye, Good Men, and pondered his main allegation, that there is a homosexual subculture among our ordained, I was incredulous. But now, I've read the data from the bishop’s sex abuse report and your very cogent analysis and, combined, they lead me to the inescapable conclusion that I believe you have posited: We are now One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic, Queer, Church. BTW, a tabernacle in one "modern" parish in my diocese looks much like a picnic basket.
Posted by: -
Mar. 11, 2004 4:54 PM ET USA
Catholics are a queer people. They accept like lemmings whatever someone with a collar tells them ... they pony up huge amounts of cash to finance whatever project the "liturgists" and the collars tell them ... and most of them haven't a clue or a care in the world about the end results. When the people learn the Faith and hold the collars to a standard consistent with it, the Queer Eyes will close. The churches will be rebuilt. And the LA monstrosity will be sold to Planned Parenthood.