Our Boosters are matching gifts up to $45,000. We have $33,972 to go. Your gift today will count twice!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

A Moment of Candor

By Diogenes (articles ) | Feb 28, 2004

At the press conference that followed yesterday's release of the John Jay Report on Sexual Abuse, EWTN's Ray Arroyo asked USCCB President Wilton Gregory whether the fact that the crimes were overwhelmingly homosexual in nature had implications for seminary recruitment and screening, etc.

"Well, Ray, to answer you candidly, we bishops are simply unable to address the question of gays in the priesthood, because we are unable to address the question of gays in our own ranks. A reasonable estimate, extrapolating from arrest reports, etc., is that 25 to 35 percent of us bishops are homosexuals. Of these, some are gay, some are closeted. Some are active, some are clean, some are chaste today but have dirt in their past. Some are deeply angry and vindictive men, others are timid and retiring. Most importantly -- and completely fatal to any honest confrontation of the issues -- we don't know who among us is homosexual and who is not. So our own discussions are always conducted in a disingenuous third-person: everyone, including gay bishops themselves, speak about gays as 'those persons,' implying detachment and objectivity.

This means that it is impossible to raise, much less resolve, the problem of special pleading. Can we trust a gay bishop to view the data impartially and use his vote and his influence to advance the good of the Church, rather than defend himself and his fellow gays -- especially when he lacks the moral courage to trust us with the truth about himself? Ray, can't you see how hopelessly mired we are in the crisis of special pleading when we can't even identify the individuals with the "interest" for which special pleading is at issue?

"Let me put it this way. We all know the case of Archbishop Rembert Weakland, an in-and-out-of-control gay man whose sordid history came out on national television in April of 2002. Now Ray, had you asked me in March 2002 if Weakland was gay, I would have denied it categorically and heatedly, and probably would have denounced you as a muckraker for even raising the question. And 99% of my fellow bishops would have joined me. But the fact is that Weakland was among us for every meeting of bishops from November of 1977 onwards. That's 25 years of speeches and votes and committee work in which -- and this is the key point -- we had to pretend he was a chaste heterosexual who had only the good of the Church at heart, including those occasions when gay issues were on the table. Can't you see how false and futile that makes our efforts now?

"Ray, we don't know how many Weaklands are still among us. We don't know how many old love-letters are still out there, hidden in dresser drawers, waiting to torpedo the man sitting next to us at the bishops conference. I mean, it's not as if Weakland let us in on the secret; we first learned about it on Good Morning America like the rest of you. I would have publicly denied it had you asked me whether Symons was gay a week before the media got the story; the same with Ziemann and Williams and Ryan and Hart and O'Connell and Dupre. And these are just the men with concrete, legally actionable dirt in their past -- God knows how many gay bishops are physically continent but twisted into some kind of emotional sheepshank because they're infatuated with a seminarian or something. All homosexual bishops, chaste or unchaste, are in perfectly good standing right up to the hour of their dismissal; and of course for the great majority a dismissal never comes. We are the only men who have the authority to tackle the problem you raised, and the best we can do is feign an interest in getting at the truth."

Obviously, this NOT the response Bishop Gregory made to Arroyo. To find out what he actually said in reply, go here and select one of the video options on the lower right side of the window. Once the file is up and playing, move the cue button to about 19 minutes into the video. Then pray a rosary.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($120,151 to go):
$150,000.00 $29,848.98
80% 20%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 6 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Feb. 28, 2004 7:44 PM ET USA

    Just ludicrous. I only listened for about ten minutes, but I heard a great deal about 'psychology' and 'emotional' aspects of the problem...and I don't think I heard one word about 'sin', or 'scandal', or any similar term. I am a convert to the Church, from an agnostic background...but if this had broken about eight years ago, I doubt that I would be a Catholic today. Not because of the sin...but because I cannot see these men as truly believing, let alone teaching, the Truth.

  • Posted by: - Feb. 28, 2004 5:17 PM ET USA

    When are the Bishops going to come out and say these guys were Queers,they were messing around with the Altar Boys not some kid in DAy Care. When I hear Gregory and those like him talk about this problem, I get a sick felling in my stomach, nothing will change until these guys are gone

  • Posted by: - Feb. 28, 2004 2:43 PM ET USA

    Oh MAN!--- You had me going just long enough to have a heartbeat of hope. But it was too perfect. How long, O Lord? How long?

  • Posted by: Pseudodionysius - Feb. 28, 2004 12:05 PM ET USA

    Nice touch about not impugning the faithful, chaste, noble, awe inspiring, almost beatified, homosexual priests who have not broken their vows. Did he say the same thing about heterosexual priests? Are there any statistical or empirical facts on these folks?

  • Posted by: Pseudodionysius - Feb. 28, 2004 12:02 PM ET USA

    A Rosary may not be enough; I recommend Adler's Ten Philosophical Mistakes....according to the press conference, and if I'm hearing Bishop Wilton "not to be confused with Pope Gregory the Great" Gregory correctly, we're all empiricists now. Locke, Hume and all the Scottish empiricists must be very pleased.

  • Posted by: Pseudodionysius - Feb. 28, 2004 9:02 AM ET USA

    I would like to express my gratitude to Diogenes, Fr Wilson, Phil Lawler, my parents, my grandparents, John Scotus Eriguena, European Celts, Julius Caesar, Plotinus, Anaxagoras, Homer, Plato, Thomas Aquinas, Dante, the unknown inventor of the wheel; unknown inventor of fire, Alexander Graham Bell, and Mazda (the Wankel Rotary Engine) for making it possible for me to view this wonderful example of present day solipsism.

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

And here's another very old story: the secular media don't understand Catholic affairs 20 hours ago
How not to be persuasive 21 hours ago
Francis the Man, Francis the Pope October 28
Clarifying what it might mean for a pope to wish to change Catholic doctrine October 28
Does the Kasper Proposal make Pope Francis a heretic? Invalid marriages and mortal sin October 28

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Key synod report calls for 'gradualism' in Church response to irregular family situations CWN - October 13
As synod concludes, bishops issue message, approve document; Pope weighs in CWN - October 20
Synod of Bishops opens with Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica CWN - October 6