We must raise $2,653 by March 31st to pay critical bills. Essential to continue our mission. Donate now!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

The amendment that doesn't

By Phil Lawler (bio - articles ) | Feb 26, 2004

In Massachusettss, Democrats are offering a "compromise amendment" to the state constitution. Since John Kerry endorses this "compromise," you know there's a catch.

Sure enough: the amendment would call for "civil unions" for gay couples.

Just a few weeks ago, defenders of marriage in Massachusetts might have thought they were getting off easy if the legislature allowed civil unions but stopped gay "marriage." That's because civil unions would have had only legislative approval; the law could have been overturned as soon as legislators recovered their senses. But this proposed amendment would enshrine civil unions in the constitution.

So the net effect of this amendment would be to defuse the public opposition to gay marriage. That's really all that it would accomplish.

And now why did Kerry endorse the measure? Because he realizes that President Bush, by backing a federal amendment that would really protect marriage, has grasped an enormously popular issue. This is Kerry's bid to look "moderate," while still giving gay-rights activists what they want.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our March expenses ($2,653 to go):
$35,000.00 $32,346.87
8% 92%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 5 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: principle not pragmatism - Feb. 27, 2004 6:50 PM ET USA

    I don't know, but isn't "civil union" the same as marriage without the religious ceremony?

  • Posted by: - Feb. 26, 2004 5:00 PM ET USA

    Once again, the "Methodist" President Bush is a much better "Catholic" than John Kerry. Three cheers for George W. Bush!

  • Posted by: Fatimabeliever - Feb. 26, 2004 3:20 PM ET USA

    They sure are hell-bent on turning America into the new Sodom!

  • Posted by: Pseudodionysius - Feb. 26, 2004 10:19 AM ET USA

    I would like to know how Senator Kerry is observing Lent.

  • Posted by: - Feb. 26, 2004 8:27 AM ET USA

    Kerry is consistent, No clear cut decision on the Amdenment, but alowing the States to determine the outcome of Marriage is like allowing a fox in the chicken house. The evidence is clearly against leaving it up to the Sataes, when we have San Francisco, New Mexico and the wakos in Kerry's home State. The President presented a clear choice, the Federal Consitution defines marriage as between a male and a female, with plently of room for the States to do what they want on civil unions.

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

Surrogate parenthood = exploitation of desperate women 0 hours ago
Scientific Evidence for the Creator 22 hours ago
A request for help from our unregistered followers March 25
Catholic movie watching is more important than watching Catholic movies March 25
Cardinal Kasper: Will flattery get him somewhere? March 25

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope announces Jubilee: a Year of Mercy CWN - March 13