re: trouble for just-war apologists
By Domenico Bettinelli, Jr. (articles ) | March 18, 2003 5:33 PM
But Bush also made the point that waiting for a madman with WMD to strike first is not self-defense, it's suicide. I think the difference is that Soviet Union, for all that it was evil, was not unstable. In other words, it's leaders knew that to strike was to invite self-destruction. However, Saddam Hussein has shown not only his willingness to use these weapons, but also his willingness to pass them on to others for use by proxy as the administration has said several times.
Besides, weren't we told time and again by the bishops during the Cold War that the doctrine of deterrence was immoral too? So what is left for us to defend ourselves?
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our March expenses ($27,446 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!