Hapgood, Kasper Agree on Designated Hitter Rule, Salary Caps
By Diogenes (articles ) | Jan 19, 2004
Of course it'll be strangled in the cradle -- like a pro-life resolution introduced at the Democratic National Convention -- but it's wryly amusing all the same. The topic of Papal Primacy is debuting at the C of E's General Synod.
The Church of England is being asked to take its biggest step towards accepting the primacy of the Pope and the concept of infallibility since Henry VIII broke from Rome 450 years ago. A joint Roman Catholic and Anglican report arguing that the Pope should be recognised as the "universal primate" is to be debated by the General Synod next month.
Personally I'm far from convinced that all Roman Catholic bishops hold an orthodox doctrine of papal infallibility, and I expect Rowan Williams to sign on to Pastor Aeternus the same week that Hillary Clinton joins Operation Rescue. However, we can anticipate some coarse entertainment in the form of old fashioned polemic of the No Popery variety and the attendant journalistic fluttering. As for resistance to the notion of universal primacy, I like the point made in Evelyn Waugh's letter (4-6-1947) to Penelope Betjeman, in response to her husband's argument that an Englishman's Catholicism could only be sought in the Church of England:
I am by nature a bully and a scold and John's pertinacity in error brings out all that is worst in me. ... I will lay off him in future. But really when he says that the truth of the Petrine claims is dependent on his place of residence, the mind boggles.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our July expenses ($15,942 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Jan. 22, 2004 8:27 AM ET USA
Actually, GOR, the Church Society of which Phillips is a member would probably be with us on the abortion, contraception, etc. issues. They are a conservative renewal group. The elements of Catholicism which the Church Society finds objectionable are eucharistic adoration, veneration of the Saints, devotion to Our Lady, etc.
Posted by: -
Jan. 20, 2004 11:16 PM ET USA
I suspect the real resistance to those "new doctrines" is a result of that age old problem that has plagued us since the Fall of Man: an unwillingness to accept any authority (doctrinal or disciplinary) higher than oneself. It is this pride and self love which is at the source of all heresy. It is this same pride that eventually so darkens the mind that once rational men (and women) can even justify the evils of abortion, contraception, women priests, etc,. etc.
Posted by: -
Jan. 19, 2004 1:56 PM ET USA
Rev. Phillips: "There is no way we would want to be linked to the Roman Catholic Church. On some issues, its teaching is even worse now than it was at the Reformation." Let's see, that would be Abortion, Birth Control, Homosexuality, Women Priests, Celibacy, Papl Infallibility... Am I getting warm? Darn, if those Romanists would just stop introducing new doctrines we'd all be fine...