February's Solidarity Campaign has netted 709 gifts so far (goal was 700). Let's set a record by the 28th!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

A rational basis for marriage

By Domenico Bettinelli, Jr. (articles ) | Jan 08, 2004

Mary Ann Glendon and Hadley Arkes have an op-ed in the Boston Herald today (it's not online) that provides a brilliant alternative to the Hobson's choice provided by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on same-sex marriage. Pro-marriage legislators and the governor have been saying that the only choice is to pass a civil unions bill to mitigate the effects of full-blown same-sex marriage (even though it would essentially be the same thing). Pro-gay legislators say the court only leaves room for full marriage for gays. And pro-family activists are saying that either we should pass a constitutional amendment (which will take years and has no guarantee of success) or impeach the justices for violating their constitutional mandate (which would require that legislators grow spines).

Glendon and Arkes provide another way. The court said, in its opinion, that the Mass. Department of Health did not adequately justify the law that limits marriage to one man and one woman and the law itself does not set forth the grounds upon which it is based. So, the two law professors say the Legislature should do just that:

Reaffirm and clarify the current marriage statute to define marriage as between one man and one woman. And include within the re-enactment the expressed legislative findings, stating clearly the rational basis for reserving the status of marriage to one man and one woman.
That's simply brilliant in both its simplicity and effectiveness. It gives an out to legislators, including Speaker of the House Tom Finneran and Gov. Mitt Romney, who previously thought there was nothing they could do.

Now, pro-gay activists could respond by asking the court to re-issue its ruling, saying explicitly that there can be no rational basis for denying gay marriage, but that would take a long time to go through the whole process, and meanwhile we could continue the effort for a constitutional amendment.

I hope Finneran and Romney are listening.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our February expenses ($6,401 to go):
$35,000.00 $28,598.54
18% 82%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

Two good publishers, six new books for Lent 22 hours ago
Another awkward 'clarification' from the Vatican February 25
Former Israeli ambassador explains how to make 'two-state solution' realistic February 25
Solidarity Campaign: Going well, thanks! And how can you help? February 25
Considering the World of Film February 24

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope Francis to address Congress in joint session in September CWN - February 5