Challenge Grant: Our Boosters will match donations up to $45,000. We have $41,060 to go. Please donate!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Should not have been treated as "things" in the first place

By Domenico Bettinelli, Jr. (articles ) | Oct 27, 2003

The wisdom of the Church in prohibiting artificial means of conception is clear. Read the article linked below. While I admire the women's desire to bear their children to birth and their view that the frozen embryos are not just clumps of cells, but are human beings, if they themselves had not viewed the children as commodities to be produced in the lab first, they wouldn't have been in this mess.

No one has a right to interfere in procreation, either in artificially preventing it or artificially prodding it. Otherwise, we buy into the view that other human beings are useful products to be created, used, or discarded as we wish. The Catholic view is the only humane one: All human beings are precious and sacred. They are the children of God, created in His image and likeness, and worth more than all gold and silver combined because they were purchased by the Sacrifice of the Cross.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($128,907 to go):
$150,000.00 $21,092.70
86% 14%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 3 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: LifeSiteNews.com - Oct. 28, 2003 11:27 AM ET USA

    The debate on the permissibility of implantation of embryos once created illicitly through IVF is still wide open. In fact the only article on the topic in L'Osservatore Romano (1996) gave reasons why "embryo adoption" would be permissible. It is referred to here: VATICAN SOLUTION TO LEFT OVER EMBRYO DILEMMA IS LITTLE KNOWN http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2002/dec/02120401.html John-Henry Westen Editor LifeSiteNews.com

  • Posted by: John J Plick - Oct. 27, 2003 7:52 PM ET USA

    The problem with modern "practical" theology is that it treats fallen man as though he was someone who merely needs to be "adjusted" rather than converted. We think we can change the tree without radical death and regeneration. If the heart is truly changed...

  • Posted by: - Oct. 27, 2003 5:10 PM ET USA

    More than 20 years ago, Malcolm Muggeridge noted: "It was the Catholic Church's firm stand against contraception and abortion which finally made me decide to become a Catholic...The Church's stand is absolutely correct. It is to its eternal honour that it opposed contraception...I think, historically, people will say it was a very gallant effort to prevent a moral disaster..." Precisely.

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Cardinal Kasper's nose is growing again October 18
Challenge Grant Begins as Synod Ends October 17
What's wrong with this Synod, IV: Unprepared for marriage October 17
No, mainstream religious orders aren't attracting vocations as fast as younger traditional orders October 17
The Synod: Is the sky falling? October 17

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Key synod report calls for 'gradualism' in Church response to irregular family situations CWN - October 13
Cardinal Parolin: UN must protect innocents from Islamic State CWN - September 30
Synod of Bishops opens with Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica CWN - October 6