a DC insider recalls the bishops' acumen
By Phil Lawler (bio - articles - send a comment) | April 27, 2010 5:16 PM
The story sounds implausible, frankly. In fact I'm inclined to believe it only because it's hard to imagine that anyone would make up such a tale.
Looking forward to President Obama's first nomination of a Supreme Court justice, the Washington Post collected thoughts, insights, and memories from several Washington insiders who had played some role in past nominations. Stuart Spencer, who was an adviser to President Gerald Ford, offered his recollections from 1975, and the involvement of the US Catholic bishops.
The bishops' approach was remarkably clumsy, as Spencer recounts the episode. His entire reminiscence is worth reading, but it boils down to this: a group of bishops gave him a list of three jurists who would, in their view, be acceptable Supreme Court justices. Spencer dutifully passed the list along to President Ford, and:
Ten days later he appoints John Paul Stevens to the bench. He was on the list.
Did the US bishops really support the nomination of Justice Stevens? Most of the players in this little historical drama have left the stage. But Stuart Spencer was there, and he says the story is true. Credo quia absurdum.
|
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus: Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you! |
Easter Campaign: Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($26,329 to go):
$80,000.00
$53,670.55
33%
67%
|
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
-
Posted by: Sed contra -
Apr. 28, 2010 9:36 PM ET USA
"Vatican II never called for bishops' conferences when it taught about collegiality." Huh? Reread "Christus Dominus" nos. 37-38, and Paul VI's motu proprio "Ecclesiae Sanctae" no. 41, in which he decreed that they should be established wherever they hadn't been already. Or are you suggesting that the Roman Pontiff's supreme, universal, ordinary, and immediate jurisdiction (Vatican I, DS 3064) doesn't include the authentic interpretation and implementation of the decrees of an ecumenical council?
-
Posted by: samuel.doucette1787 -
Apr. 28, 2010 9:04 AM ET USA
The USCCB needs to be disbanded. Vatican II never called for bishops' conferences when it taught about collegiality.
