We'll receive a $25,000 grant if others match it by Pentecost. $24,070 to go. Your gift will be doubled!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

The Mirror Image of Abortion

By Phil Lawler (bio - articles - email) | Jul 30, 2009

 In Worcester, Massachusetts-- a city close to the quiet little town where I live-- a ghoulish crime has drawn national attention. A young woman with a troubled past was found dead: an apparent murder victim. She had been 8 months pregnant, and the child had been cut out of her womb-- apparently by someone who wanted the child for himself. A few days later, police arrested an acquaintance of the murder victim, who had traveled to another state with a newborn child, and charged her with kidnapping. 

Kidnapping is a terrible crime, yet the term doesn't seem adequate to describe this atrocity. It isn't terribly unusual, alas, for a kidnapping to end with a murder. In this case a murder evidently began the hideous sequence of crime. The full details of the case have not yet emerged. And when they do, I'm not sure I'll have the stomach to read about them. Thank God, at least, that the baby is alive, and appears to be physically unharmed.

Apart from the fact that it was done illegally, in a squalid apartment rather than an antiseptic clinic, it struck me that the assault on that unfortunate Worcester woman was like a mirror image of a surgical abortion. In this case it was the mother who was brutally carved up and her body cast aside, while the baby emerged intact. Usually things work the other way. Still we should recognize that the everyday reality of abortion, stripped of its pseudo-medical facade, is just as brutal as this crime which has sent shock waves across the country. 

There is one key difference that spoils the symmetry between the crimes. In an ordinary abortion, the baby dies to suit the needs, real or imagined, of the pregnant woman. In the Worcester case the baby had no designs against his mother. The crime (the violent kidnapping, that is; the murder may have been a separate matter) was done to benefit a third party: a woman who wanted a baby. Then again, how many pregnant women would prefer to keep their babies, but are cajoled, pressured, threatened, even forced into abortion by third parties: the parents who do not want the stigma of a bastard grandchild; the boyfriends who don't want the burden of child-support payments?

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Spring Challenge Grant
Progress toward our Spring Challenge Grant goal ($24,070 to go):
$25,400.00 $1,330.00
95% 5%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Matching Campaign
Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

A silent scandal: Catholic schools promoting morally unacceptable vaccines 9 hours ago
A More Militant Church? 9 hours ago
How we'll know if the Vatican and the US hierarchy are serious about deposing negligent bishops 10 hours ago
Final take on the LCWR: A time to plant, a time to uproot 12 hours ago
With the LCWR, has the Vatican taken Gamaliel's advice? 16 hours ago

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope challenges world leaders' silence on persecution of Christians CWN - April 6
Pope outlines plans for the extraordinary jubilee of mercy CWN - April 13
Vatican completes doctrinal assessment of Leadership Conference of Women Religious CWN - April 16
Pope accepts resignation of Bishop Finn CWN - April 21