Your gift counts double until 5/31: $20,973 to go in our Easter Campaign. Please help now!
 On the Culture

Intermediary Institutions Represent, Preserve and Shape a Robust Culture

By Dr. Jeff Mirus (bio - articles - send a comment) | August 10, 2012 12:27 PM

Those who read After Liberalism, the Deluge? will see that once again I call for the formation and strengthening of culture through “intermediary institutions”. Some might say: “This sounds grand and noble, but what does it really mean? What can we concretely do to form and strengthen culture through intermediary institutions?”

As a social being, the human person flourishes to the highest degree in a cultural environment in which a wide range of legitimate human interests and ends are pursued cooperatively to achieve a higher level of perfection than the individual can typically achieve on his own, and to influence and enrich the larger culture as a whole. Typically, such cooperative efforts give rise to what we call intermediary institutions, cooperative agencies of human organization which—through their own particular excellence, effectiveness and earned respect in a particular field of human endeavor—exercise a powerful influence on how individual persons pursue certain goals, the boundaries and standards applicable to those pursuits, and the responsibilities inherent in them.

It is often said that this cooperative spirit, and the number of intermediary institutions it generates, is substantially greater in the United States than in other Western nations. Nonetheless, it grows more difficult with every passing year to undertake cooperative activities even in the United States because of the increasing burden of laws and regulations which demand that such activities adhere to a particular blueprint for approval by the State. It is far harder now than fifty years ago, for example, to do everything from establishing a social service organization to constructing a playground for local youngsters.

Moreover, throughout the West, many “blueprinted” organizations are actually no longer cooperative, but operate with State funding derived from enforced taxes. Those who wish to establish alternative organizations (whether to recover the heightened personalism of truly voluntary service or to escape the prevailing ideology) must make extreme sacrifices. They must double both their financial burden (paying taxes plus funding their own independent establishments) and their burden of effort (meeting regulations while focusing on their own central purposes). Lacking State subsidies, they must also charge more for any services they provide (either direct charges or donations). This creates an unfairly competitive conflict between robust cultural institutions and the coercive ideological power of the State.

Under what we call “hard” totalitarianism, the establishment of authentic independent intermediary institutions is all but impossible, except insofar as they are kept secret. In the more typical “soft” totalitarianism of the West, however, there is still some room for the creation of robust institutions which, though they may be small and beleaguered now, are likely to be the foundation for positive human development and social organization as more and more people seek a life apart from the State, or as the State grows less effective, or as the State collapses, in the end, under its own weight.

What, then, are some of these actual and potential intermediary institutions?

There are other types of intermediary institutions as well. Also notably absent from this discussion are three important topics: (1) The way in which a variety of such institutions, all inspired in part by a common Christian vision, combine to shape a larger culture; (2) A consideration of various forms of local government, in which citizens genuinely participate, as intermediary institutions which can counter-balance the usurpations of higher levels of government; and (3) The importance of the family which, as the fundamental cell of a healthy society, is critical to the success of all other endeavors and which, when injured or broken, virtually guarantees the collapse of culture.

But for now I have provided some background and the beginning of a specific list of the kinds of possible intermediary institutions, knowing that in each category, the specific purposes and forms of these institutions can be many and varied. If readers will comment on specific intermediate institutions with which they have experience, I would be glad to flesh out this discussion with case studies.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Easter Campaign:
Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($20,973 to go):
$80,000.00 $59,027.50
26% 74%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Think with the Catholic Leaders: Subscribe to Catholic Culture Insights Newsletter
Donate to Support this Site: Your contribution will be put to good work.
Tour the CatholicCulture.org Site
Shop Amazon to Raise Money for Catholic Culture

Recent Catholic Commentary

Revealing News, and Revealing Christ 5 hours ago
The Russell Ford problem 6 hours ago
Fr. Thadeus Nguyen Van Ly: Your Letter May Help 12 hours ago
The Rise and Fall of the (American?) Church May 23
The Ideal of Pope Francis: the Servant Church May 23

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope strongly supports call for reform in religious life CWN - May 8